Major Parts of Speech

Erkenntnis 80 (1):3-29 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn’t seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech. I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-11

Downloads
22 (#975,058)

6 months
8 (#591,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anna Kollenberg
Universität Erfurt

Citations of this work

Essentializing Inferences.Katherine Ritchie - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (4):570-591.
Formal Semantics and Applied Mathematics: An Inferential Account.Ryan M. Nefdt - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (2):221-253.
Structural entailment and semantic natural kinds.Brendan Balcerak Jackson - 2017 - Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (3):207-237.

Add more citations