Evolution of Expertiment in the Context of Technogenic Civilization

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (4):123-127 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical and methodological approaches to the processes of experimental measurement are discussed in the context of the modern natural sciences. “A collective experimenter” category is considered as conceptual foundation of modern experimentation in the scientific researches’ directions oriented to the people surviving in the modern world. Deepening of ecological crisis and its overcoming are connected to the process of noosphere’s elements formation. Howard Pattee’s approaches to the essence of the experiment are considered from the perspective of his ideas of dynamic and linguistic complementarity of levels of a complex system. Pattee insists on the fact that artificial complex system does not exist except as abstraction that leaves out the brain in which their description originated. Howard Pattee have made the distinction between rate-dependent dynamical processes and rate-independent linguistic descriptions as essential component of complex systems. According to Pattee, “a measuring device is a physical constraint that tacitly execute a rule that relate a system to an element of description of system. Any attempt to make the dynamics of this execution explicit or detail only obscures the measurements. That is the more you describe the measuring device, the less effectively it measures or describes system. A similar situation occurs when we generate speech. Either we can say what we mean, or we can analyze how we have said it, but trying to do both at the same time renders us incoherent. We cannot speak two languages at once, since the essence of any language is the unity, completeness and coherence of its syntactical rules”. Thus, Pattee’s approach could be used to explain how action with things produces numbers. It is also very important that a complex system must read and write its own messages. Therefore, no external observer is needed for self-describing of the complex system. Pattee’s approach seems to be very promising for Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory development.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,246

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

セルラ・オートマトン・シミュレータ用インタプリタの開発.遠藤 聡志 赤嶺 有平 - 2002 - Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 17:380-389.
System and Theory in Philosophy.Paul Gilbert - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (229):331 - 341.
The Evolution of Science: A Systems Approach.Kai Hahlweg - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Remarks on the Geometry of Complex Systems and Self-Organization.Luciano Boi - 2012 - In Vincenzo Fano, Enrico Giannetto, Giulia Giannini & Pierluigi Graziani, Complessità e Riduzionismo. ISONOMIA - Epistemologica Series Editor. pp. 28-43.
Who am I?Laura Alba-Juez & Félix Alba-Juez - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (3):570-592.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
5 (#1,790,985)

6 months
1 (#1,597,010)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references