Futile and Potentially Inappropriate Interventions: Semantics Matter

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):383-389 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, five major critical care professional organizations in North America and Europe published a consensus policy statement on how intensive care unit clinicians should respond to patient or surrogate requests for potentially inappropriate treatments. Subsequently, the Society for Critical Care Medicine, the largest multidisciplinary critical care organization and one of the authors of the Multiorganization Policy Statement, issued a companion statement defining futile and potentially inappropriate interventions. These statements support previous work published by the SCCM Ethics Committee 20 years ago. The critical care...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Abuse of Futility.Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Nancy S. Jecker & Albert R. Jonsen - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):295-313.
Nurturing Futility in the NICU: The Dutch Perspective.A. A. Eduard Verhagen - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):449-455.
Criterialism versus Deliberativism.Cheryl Misak - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):408-414.
Medical Futility and Involuntary Passive Euthanasia.Michael Nair-Collins - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):415-422.
The Brutal but Utile Truth of "Futile".Arthur R. Derse - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):340-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-25

Downloads
32 (#718,209)

6 months
7 (#761,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references