Abstract

The groundwork of this paper comes from 3 months of research in the Reindeer-husbandryHusbandry part of the Kola Peninsula. I examined the variety of uses of the ‘wild Nature’ concept among three groups of tundra-focussed actors. They fall on both sides of a ‘dominating/dominated’ class division in the context of post-Soviet reality. The findings suggest a reassessment of the position, inherent in critiques of ‘Nature-culture’ Dichotomies, according to which they are conceptually born exclusively for the purposes of domination. Uses of tundra space, firmly separated from an urban antipode, reveal motivations of dominance by empowered actors. At the same time, uses through which disempowered actors attain access to appealing alternative cosmologies can also be seen. Such diverse uses of tundra space I examine through their realizations in terms of tundra access and mobility. I show that a dichotomizing town-tundra division is perceived as necessary for all of them, but for different reasons. This calls for reassessing existing critiques of Culture-natureBounderism. Its conceptual roots as well as instrumental motivations are in need of examination beyond current privileging of empowered actors as exclusive agents. The role of disempowered actors for sustaining Culture-natureDichotomies, their diverse conceptualizations and forms of agency need also to be considered.