When Studying the Mind, What Domain is Being Investigated?

Constructivist Foundations 18 (1):18-20 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I problematize the ambiguity in the use of the terms, “cognition” and “mind.” Do these terms describe specific dynamics of physical changes within the organism (i.e., a third-person perspective) or subjective experience (a first-person perspective? I argue that the lack of precision in addressing cognitive science’s domain of research creates a blind spot about the central importance of subjective experience.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

First-Person Science is Third Person and Vice Versa.Chris Fields - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):240-241.
Body‐intentionality.Corbin Collins - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (December):495-518.
Lived Experience: Past and Present.John Stewart - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):237-238.
In Search of a Remedy.O. Markič - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):385-387.
Intersubjectivity in the Study of Experience.H. De Jaegher - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):393-395.
Why Not First-Person Research on Lived Experience?Toma Strle - 2020 - Constructivist Foundations 16 (1):081-083.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-27

Downloads
3 (#1,855,626)

6 months
3 (#1,491,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references