Substitution inconsistencies in Transparent Intensional Logic

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 31 (3-4):355-371 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents several important results for Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL). The conversions that are standardly taken to be valid – namely restricted β-conversion by name and β-reduction by value – are shown to be invalid. The core principle on which their validity is based – the so-called Compensation Principle – is also shown to be invalid. Further, the paper demonstrates the flaws of the proof of the Compensation Principle.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-29

Downloads
78 (#269,459)

6 months
16 (#190,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?