Namba forcing and no good scale

Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (3):785-802 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Namba forcing, weak approximation, and guessing.Sean Cox & John Krueger - 2018 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (4):1539-1565.
Bounded Namba forcing axiom may fail.Jindrich Zapletal - 2018 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 64 (3):170-172.
Preservation theorems for Namba forcing.Osvaldo Guzmán, Michael Hrušák & Jindřich Zapletal - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (2):102869.
Forcing axioms, approachability, and stationary set reflection.Sean D. Cox - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (2):499-530.
Kurepa trees and Namba forcing.Bernhard König & Yasuo Yoshinobu - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (4):1281-1290.
A model for a very good scale and a bad scale.Dima Sinapova - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1361-1372.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
13 (#1,316,561)

6 months
6 (#846,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Squares, scales and stationary reflection.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (01):35-98.
Notes on Singular Cardinal Combinatorics.James Cummings - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (3):251-282.

Add more references