Social risks of postmodernity: essence and classification

Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (1-2):16-28 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is revealed that the concept of ‘social risk’ was formed in line with the creation of the theory of social state and the theory of welfare state. Social risk is defined as the probability of a person losing material resources to meet his basic needs, necessary for the preservation and reproduction of a full-fledged life as a member of society. These basic needs include food, clothing, housing, medical care and social services. It is proved that the objective basis of social risk is the antagonistic nature of social relations, structural features, the nature, growth of social exclusion, the violation of adaptive processes in society, as well as the widespread distribution of various kinds of deviations among the population. Particular attention is paid to the description of the modern model of social risk. It is established that a fundamentally new type of social risk is a global risk as a product of a post-industrial society. In conditions of globalization, a list of life circumstances that violate the normal livelihoods of the individual and which it can not overcome on its own, is expanding substantially. Such unconventional social risks include support for families with children, education and care for children, care for sick children and parents, assistance in housing construction and maintenance, maternity support for a period of interrupted vocational education of up to five years per child, poverty, etc. Trace the evolution of the content of social risks from the industrial society of the period of initial accumulation of capital to modern society. If, at an early stage, social risks were generated by the production and distribution of goods, values, today they are produced by the production and distribution of the dangers and fears, that is, social risks in the society of risk are self-replicating, and this production becomes expanded, that is, it involves the phases of self-production, distribution and consumption of risks.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem of scientific certainty of the phenomenon of «social risks in the system of social protection of the population».Вікторія Леонідівна Погрібна - 2018 - Вісник Нюу Імені Ярослава Мудрого: Серія: Філософія, Філософія Права, Політологія, Соціологія 2 (37):77-92.
Social Risks and Welfare States.Gøsta Esping‐Andersen - 1998 - In Gøsta Esping-Andersen (ed.), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press UK.
Praxeological aspects of political risks in Ukraine.O. Vinnychuk - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (23):10-16.
Just Social Risk Imposition and the Demand for Fair Risk Sharing.Yunmeng Cai - 2021 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 19 (3):254-279.
Directions of cultural-symbolical definition of political risks.V. Krivoshein - 2011 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (21):98-104.
Identification risks in the modern political process:a sociological focus of analysis.Vitaliy Volodimirovich KrivosheYin - 2019 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2 (1):14-21.
Virtual risks in an age of cybernetic reproduction.Joost Van Loon - 2000 - In Barbara Adam, Ulrich Beck & Joost Van Loon (eds.), The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-28

Downloads
15 (#1,246,497)

6 months
3 (#1,491,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?