Auditory and visual objects

Cognition 80 (1-2):97-126 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Notions of objecthood have traditionally been cast in visuocentric terminology. As a result, theories of auditory and cross-modal perception have focused more on the differences between modalities than on the similarities. In this paper we re-examine the concept of an object in a way that overcomes the limitations of the traditional perspective. We propose a new, cross-modal conception of objecthood which focuses on the similarities between modalities instead of the differences. Further, we propose that the auditory system might consist of two parallel streams of processing (the `what' and `where' subsystems) in a manner analogous to current conceptions of the visual system. We suggest that the `what' subsystems in each modality are concerned with objecthood. Finally, we present evidence for—and elaborate on—the hypothesis that the auditory `where' subsystem is in the service of the visual-motor `where' subsystem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Audio-visual objects.Michael Kubovy & Michael Schutz - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):41-61.
Object Perception: Vision and Audition.Casey O’Callaghan - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.
Picture perception and the two visual subsystems.Bence Nanay - 2008 - Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Hearing, Philosophical Perspectives.Casey O'Callaghan - 2009 - In Hal Pashler (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Mind. Sage Publications. pp. 388-390.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
139 (#160,955)

6 months
61 (#92,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Kubovy
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

Smelling objects.Becky Millar - 2019 - Synthese 196 (10):4279-4303.
Objects for multisensory perception.Casey O’Callaghan - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1269-1289.
Object Perception: Vision and Audition.Casey O’Callaghan - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.

View all 39 citations / Add more citations