Logic and Formal Truth

Madison, WI, USA: Freud Institute (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is explained what it is for a statement to be logically true and it is thereby explained what it is for a statement to be formally true. It is also explained how logical truth differs from formal truth. Further, it is explained what a system of logic is. Finally, the nature of entailment is explained and, in particular, it is explained how formal entailment differs from analytic entailment.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic as language habits versus logic as formal truth.Marie Swabey - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (5):119-128.
Logical Form and Truth-Conditions.Andrea Iacona - 2013 - Theoria 28 (3):439-457.
Entailment and bivalence.Fred Seymour Michael - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):289-300.
What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal?John MacFarlane - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Distributive Terms, Truth, and the Port Royal Logic.John N. Martin - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):133-154.
First Degree Entailment, Symmetry and Paradox.Greg Restall - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (1):3-18.
Is Formal Logic a Science About Rational Arguments?Svatopluk Nevrkla - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (4):499-511.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John-Michael Kuczynski
University of California, Santa Barbara (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references