Abstract

The first part of this dissertation frames the theoretical, philosophical, and psychological foundations of the ecological worldview. The second part of this study is a quantitative analysis of a research survey completed by the California State legislature comparing the "ecological paradigm" with the "dominant social paradigm." This research is in part a replication of a 1976 study conducted by Professor Riley Dunlap, of Washington State University and Professor Kent Van Liere of the University of Tennessee. ;I argue that if environmental catastrophe is to be avoided, the. dominant social paradigm must be replaced by an ecological paradigm---a perspective that emphasizes an interdependent connectedness of humans with the natural world. I also stipulate that the dominant social paradigm is reflected in current environmental policies and practices, which in intentional, unanticipated or misdirected ways is contributing to the harm being done to the Earth. ;Presented is an ecopsychological framework within the theory of humanistic psychology that incorporates an integration of the human-nature relationship. Challenging and questioning the psychological foundation inherent in the dominant belief system is necessary for a change to occur that will promote more ecological values, ethics, and attitudes in individual and societal worldviews. ;Also examined is the prevalence of eco-pathological states, such as, denial, dissociation, and repression of the environmental crisis and addiction and narcissism associated with over-consumption. Individual and societal awareness of these mostly unconscious coping mechanisms is needed for a change to an ecological consciousness and the recognition of an inherent ecological-self