Universals, Particulars and Change

Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):548 - 564 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thus one must justify any category which he proposes as ultimate, and a classic justification is to raise imaginative thinking to a reductio ad absurdam, in which being, imagined without the category, is shown to be incompatible with being as we best know it, i.e., as including some other category which the philosophical community to whom he addresses his remarks will not deny.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

More on What There Isn’t.Michael P. Slattery - 1972 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (2):344 - 348.
Sellars' Vision of Man-in-the-Universe, II.Richard J. Bernstein - 1966 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (2):290 - 316.
Pictures, Quotations, and Distinctions. [REVIEW]Edward Pols - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (3):638-640.
Mr. Hochberg on Moore: Some Corrections.John O. Nelson - 1962 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (1):119 - 132.
Prosoponic Ontology and Its Prospectives.J. Letz - 2002 - Filozofia 57 (8):582-590.
Action, Symbolism, and Order. [REVIEW]O. H. S. - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (2):384-385.
The Four-Category Ontology. [REVIEW]Brandon C. Look - 2007 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (3):666-668.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
26 (#856,815)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references