What are the arguments against the majority's desire for punishment?

Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (1):45-52 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/0731129x.2008.9992227

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mill’s Defense of Capital Punishment.C. L. Ten - 2017 - Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (2):141-151.
Sham arguments and capital punishment.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):3-6.
Arguing against inhumane and degrading punishment.Richard L. Lippke - 1998 - Criminal Justice Ethics 17 (1):29-41.
Punishment and Forgiveness.Justin Tosi & Brandon Warmke - 2016 - In Jonathan Jacobs & Jonathan Jackson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics. Routledge. pp. 203-216.
Ján Kollár’s Thoughts on Capital Punishment.Vasil Gluchman - 2021 - Studies in Christian Ethics 34 (2):171-189.
Punishment, Danger and Stigma; The Morality of Criminal Justice.Robert S. Gerstein - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (1):119-122.
Protecting fetuses from prenatal hazards: Whose crimes? What punishment?Kathleen Nolan - 1990 - Criminal Justice Ethics 9 (1):13-23.
Punishment vs. reconciliation: retributive justice and social justice in the light of social ethics.Patrick Kerans - 1982 - Kingston, Ont.: Queen's Theological College.
Punishment, the criminal law, and Christian social ethics.David A. Hoekema - 1986 - Criminal Justice Ethics 5 (2):31-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
22 (#981,487)

6 months
4 (#1,269,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Neutrality, autonomy, and freedom of contract.Kimel Dori - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (3):473-494.

Add more references