``Coherentism: Misconstrual and Misapprehension"

Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):159-169 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some critics of coherentism have depicted it so that it founders on the distinction between warrant for the content of a belief and warrant for the believing itself. This distinction has to do with the basing relation: one might have warrant for the content of what one believes without basing one's belief properly, without holding the belief because of what warrants it. When the first kind of warrant obtains, I will say that a belief is propositionally warranted.

Other Versions

reprint Kvanvig, Jonathan (2012) "Coherentism". In Cullison, Andrew, The Continuum Companion to Epistemology, pp. : Continuum (2012)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
93 (#233,218)

6 months
13 (#197,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan L. Kvanvig
Washington University in St. Louis

Citations of this work

Coherentism and justified inconsistent beliefs: A solution.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):21-41.
Basic reasons and first philosophy: A coherentist view of reasons.Ted Poston - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):75-93.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references