Životaschopnost' jedného prístupu. Poznámky ku kantovskej línii interpretácie kategórie vznešenéhi

Espes 2 (1):20-26 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To elaborate the intention of previous contribution, this paper opens again the problem of reception of Kant's definition of the category sublime. Variations which perform Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Adorno represent some innovative approaches. Bridging the history of this aesthetic category in the 20th century in theirs thinking, represents functionality of the sublime, which we observe through the transformations in artistic and aesthetic discourse and which encourages us to an contemporary revaluation of this concept.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-27

Downloads
21 (#1,004,296)

6 months
4 (#1,247,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adrian Kvokacka
University of Presov

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Awe or envy: Herder contra Kant on the sublime.Rachel Zuckert - 2003 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61 (3):217–232.
Free play and true well-being: Herder's critique of Kant's aesthetics.Paul Guyer - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):353–368.
Schopenhauer on the Values of Aesthetic Experience.Bart Vandenabeele - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):565-582.

Add more references