Bifurcated Sceptical Invariantism: Between Gettier Cases and Saving Epistemic Appearances

Journal of Philosophical Research 42:27-44 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I present an argument for a sophisticated version of sceptical invariantism that has so far gone unnoticed: Bifurcated Sceptical Invariantism (BSI). I argue that it can, on the one hand, (dis)solve the Gettier problem, address the dogmatism paradox and, on the other hand, show some due respect to the Moorean methodological incentive of ‘saving epistemic appearances’. A fortiori, BSI promises to reap some other important explanatory fruit that I go on to adduce (e.g. account for concessive knowledge attributions). BSI can achieve this much because it distinguishes between two distinct but closely interrelated (sub)concepts of (propositional) knowledge, fallible-but-safe knowledge and infallible-and-sensitive knowledge, and explains how the pragmatics and the semantics of knowledge discourse operate at the interface of these two (sub)concepts of knowledge. I conclude that BSI is a novel theory of knowledge discourse that merits serious investigation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Adapt or die: The death of invariantism&quest.Jessica Brown - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):263-285.
Defending a sensitive neo-Moorean invariantism.Tim Black - 2007 - In Vincent Hendricks (ed.), New Waves in Epistemology. Aldershot, England and Burlington, VT, USA: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 8--27.
Skeptical Invariantism, Considered.Gregory Stoutenburg - 2021 - In Christos Kyriacou & Kevin Wallbridge (eds.), Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 80-101.
Stanley's Three Flaws.Stefan Riedener - 2010 - Swiss Philosophical Preprints.
Epistemic invariantism and speech act contextualism.John Turri - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):77-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-01

Downloads
554 (#47,870)

6 months
71 (#81,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christos Kyriacou
University of Cyprus

Citations of this work

A Cumulative Case Argument for Infallibilism.Nevin Climenhaga - 2021 - In Christos Kyriacou & Kevin Wallbridge (eds.), Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered. New York, NY: Routledge.
Knowledge and loose talk.Alexander Dinges - 2021 - In Christos Kyriacou & Kevin Wallbridge (eds.), Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 272-297.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Warrant Does Entail Truth.Andrew Moon - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):287-297.

Add more references