The Significance of Spatial Representation

Dissertation, University of California, San Diego (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation explores the fundamental role of spatial representation in constituting thought. The thesis of this dissertation is that spatial representation is a fundamental constituent of thought in two ways. First, reference is a metaphorical extension of grasping material objects located in physical space. Second, predication is the relative placement of representations of these referents in a high-dimensional neural activation space. Hence, spatial representation, albeit in two different senses, is fundamental to both reference and predication, which are themselves the fundamental constituents of thought. In other words, "spatial representation" actually plays two fundamental roles in thought: the representation of objects as located in physical space allows us to refer to them, and the representation of objects in activation space allows us to conceptualize them. ;After a brief introduction in Chapter 1, the first part of this dissertation situates the problem of spatial representation in philosophical context, both synchronically and diachronically . The second part considers in detail Strawson's "Kantian" arguments for the fundamental importance of spatial representation. It concludes that, although Strawson does not carefully distinguish the importance of physical space for reference from the importance of activation space for predication, his arguments ultimately pertain to both. The final part of this dissertation presents an argument for the fundamental importance of neural activation space in categorizing stimuli and defends this "state-space semantics" against the charge that it cannot support any notion of identity of content. In addition to a method for comparing the similarity of representations across neural networks, the chapter contains the results of empirical studies with artificial neural networks demonstrating that internal representations are often remarkably similar in "speakers" of the same artificial language, despite differences in inputs and architectures. The conclusion contains a summary of the dissertation and suggestions for future research

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references