On Aristotle's peri hermeneias 16a1–18: The case of an Anonymous Armenian commentary

Classical Quarterly 71 (2):866-885 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The anonymous Armenian commentary was transmitted together with the Armenian translation of Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias. It was composed in the Hellenizing style and commonly associated with the figure of David the Invincible, a philosopher of the Neoplatonic School of Alexandria. This article presents a general structural analysis of the commentary followed by a comparative study and translation of its first chapter. It argues that the commentary was indeed written in the tradition of late antique Greek commentaries but was probably not associated with late Neoplatonism. The Armenian commentary shares many common features with Ammonius’ commentary, but also departs from it on many crucial aspects. From a philosophical standpoint, it has much more in common with Boethius’ and Alexander of Aphrodisias’ commentaries than with those of the Neoplatonic School of Alexandria, thus suggesting an early writing date.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Horoscopes of the Anonymous Commentary on Ptolemy’s ‘Tetrabiblos’.Raúl Caballero-Sánchez - 2022 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 85 (1):1-23.
Pseudo-Zeno: Anonymous Philosophical Treatise.Michael Stone - 1999 - Boston: Brill. Edited by Michael E. Stone, M. E. Shirinian, Jaap Mansfeld & David T. Runia.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
12 (#1,383,974)

6 months
7 (#653,123)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations