Predation and generation processes through a new representation of the cusp catastrophe

Acta Biotheoretica 45 (2):93-115 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A new formulation of the cusp catastrophe is used to model the fundamental biological functions of predation and reproduction. This new representation lies on the decomposition of the overall cusp potential in two component potentials individualising the conflicting pregnances. It results in a more accurate and less problematic description than the original proposition by R. Thom, mostly due to the use of parameters with strong physical and evocative power. For instance, it gives a very suggestive account for such biologically significant processes as digestion and assimilation, or pregnancy and delivery. Two couples of parameters are used in the new representation of the cusp: one defines the exact shape of the conflicting attractors which symbolises genetic coding, the other controls the deformation of -and interaction between- the two attractors and represent hormonal effects. This new description strikingly echoes Heidegger's philosophical thought on ontological difference, by giving a representation of the distinct concepts of entity and Being. It thus precludes a previous criticism concerning the impossibility for catastrophic models to depict the entity level. Such a type of representation might be useful in translating syntactical-semantic models of catastrophe theory into computer language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#727,171)

6 months
4 (#1,247,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Esquisse d'une sémiophysique.René Thom - 1989 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 179 (4):656-658.
Apologie du logos.René Thom - 1992 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 182 (2):261-262.
Qu'appelle-t-on penser?Martin Heidegger - 1964 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 20 (1):257-258.

View all 6 references / Add more references