Complicit Suffering and the Duty to Self-Care

Philosophy 93 (2):251-277 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral questions surrounding suffering tend to focus on obligations to relieve others’ suffering. In this paper, I focus on the overlooked question of what sufferers morally owe to themselves, arguing that they have the duty to self-care. I discuss agents who have been shaped by moral luck to contribute to their own suffering and canvass the ways in which this damages their moral agency. I contend that these agents have a duty to care for themselves by protecting and expanding their agency, which involves precluding further destruction of agency and ensuring the continued ability to self-care.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-22

Downloads
86 (#244,569)

6 months
12 (#302,973)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alycia LaGuardia
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

On why the poor have duties too.Ashwini Vasanthakumar - 2023 - Ethics and Global Politics 16 (2):8-16.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Obligation to Resist Oppression.Carol Hay - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (1):21-45.
Servility and self-respect.Thomas E. Hill - 1973 - The Monist 57 (1):87 - 104.
Selflessness and the loss of self.Jean Hampton - 1993 - Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (1):135-65.

View all 14 references / Add more references