A response to a call to cognition

Behaviorism 13 (2):147-149 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The view of Deitz and Arrington (1984) that Wittgenstein's ordinary language philosophy allows behaviorism to use cognitive terms with a behavioristic system is disputed and an alternative is suggested.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

reprint Lamal, Pa (1985) "Wittgenstein language-games and the call to cognition-response". Behaviorism 13(2):147-149

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Response to a Call to Cognition: Comments on Deitz and Arrington.P. A. Lamal - 1985 - Behavior and Philosophy 13 (2):147.
" Wittgenstein's Language-Games and the Call to Cognition:" Comments on Deitz and Arrington (1984).Edward K. Morris - 1985 - Behaviorism 13 (2):137-146.
Wittgenstein's Language-Games and the Call to Cognition.Samuel M. Deitz - 1984 - Behavior and Philosophy 12 (2):1.
Quine’s Behaviorism and Linguistic Meaning: Why Quine’s Behaviorism is not Illicit.Tyrus Fisher - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):51-59.
The limits of language: Wittgenstein's later philosophy and Skinner's radical behaviorism.Alan Costall - 1980 - Behaviorism 8 (2):123-131.
Operationalism and ordinary language: A critique of Wittgenstein.Charles S. Chihara & Jerry A. Fodor - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4):281-95.
Psychological concepts, explication, and ordinary language.Hilary Putnam - 1957 - Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-14

Downloads
12 (#1,412,176)

6 months
12 (#218,371)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references