Category-specific deficits and exemplar models

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):484-485 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Humphreys & Forde's HIT provides a comprehensive account of category-specific deficits, standard models of categorization and identification may also be able to explain many aspects of such deficits. The assumptions of an exemplar-based account of category- specific deficits are presented, and it is argued that exemplar models may be able to explain key findings on impaired object identification and categorization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Category-specific deficits: Will a simpler model do?Jules Davidoff - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):481-482.
Is category specificity in the world or in the mind?H. Clark Barrett - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):478-479.
Conceptual deficits without features: A view from atomism.Roberto G. de Almeida - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):482-483.
Beyond the sensory/functional dichotomy.George S. Cree & Ken McRae - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):480-481.
On disentangling and weighting kinds of semantic knowledge.Agnesa Pillon & Dana Samson - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):490-490.
Intact grammars but intermittent access.Susan Edwards & David Lightfoot - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):31-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#280,085)

6 months
17 (#165,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references