Miracles and principles of relative likelihood

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (3):123 - 131 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I EXAMINE VARIOUS SUGGESTED PRINCIPLES FOR WEIGHING TESTIMONY TO PAST EVENTS AND IDENTIFY ONE WHICH SEEMS TO BE BOTH TRUE AND ROUGHLY IN THE SPIRIT OF DAVID HUME’S ESSAY. I ARGUE THAT HUME FAILS TO PROVIDE GOOD REASONS FOR SAYING THAT THIS PRINCIPLE, WHEN APPLIED TO REPORTS OF MIRACLES PURPORTING TO SUPPORT RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, WILL ALWAYS LEAD US TO REJECT THE OCCURRENCE OF THE MIRACLE

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Interpreting Hume on miracles.Robert A. Larmer - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):325-338.
Hume and Religious Miracles.Gregory L. Bock - 2011 - Philosophia Christi 13 (1):165-168.
Hume and miracles.Matthew C. Bagger - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (2):237 - 251.
The credibility of miracles.Ruth Weintraub - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (3):359 - 375.
Miracles and Testimony.Keith Ward - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (2):131 - 145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
70 (#303,042)

6 months
11 (#364,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce Langtry
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Miracles.Timothy McGrew - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Miracles.Michael Levine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hume, Laws of Nature, and Miracles.Nathan M. Otteman & Daniel E. Flage - 2024 - The European Legacy 29 (7):716-731.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vindicating the “principle of relative likelihood”.Keith Chrzan - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (1):13 - 18.

Add more references