Propositions directly about particulars

Mind 38 (150):219-225 (1929)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/xxxviii.150.219

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

LEWIS, C. I., and C. H. LANGFORD - Symbolic Logic. [REVIEW]J. Wisdom - 1934 - Mind 43:99.
Langford C. H.. The nature of formal analysis. Mind, n.s. vol. 58 , pp. 210–214.Nelson Goodman - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (3):222-222.
Book Review:Symbolic Logic C. I. Lewis, C. H. Langford. [REVIEW]W. C. C. - 1952 - Philosophy of Science 19 (2):180-.
Langford C. H.. Note on a device of Quine and Goodman.Carl G. Hempel - 1942 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):98-98.
Langford C. H.. A theorem on deducibility for second-order functions. [REVIEW]W. V. Quine - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (1):30-30.
C. H. Langford. The institutional use of the. Philosophy and phenomenological research, vol. 10 no. 1 , pp. 115–120.Charles A. Baylis - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):63-63.
Are Particulars Constituents of Propositions?Lucius Garvin - 1934 - The Monist 44 (2):248-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#295,499)

6 months
14 (#227,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is a Singular Proposition?Ephraim N. Glick - 2018 - Mind 127 (508):1027-1067.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references