Bolzano a priori knowledge, and the Classical Model of Science

Synthese 174 (2):263-281 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is aimed at understanding one central aspect of Bolzano's views on deductive knowledge: what it means for a proposition and for a term to be known a priori. I argue that, for Bolzano, a priori knowledge is knowledge by virtue of meaning and that Bolzano has substantial views about meaning and what it is to know the latter. In particular, Bolzano believes that meaning is determined by implicit definition, i.e. the fundamental propositions in a deductive system. I go into some detail in presenting and discussing Bolzano's views on grounding, a priori knowledge and implicit definition. I explain why other aspects of Bolzano's theory and, in particular, his peculiar understanding of analyticity and the related notion of Ableitbarkeit might, as it has invariably in the past, mislead one to believe that Bolzano lacks a significant account oï a priori knowledge. Throughout the paper, I point out to the ways in which, in this respect, Bolzano's antagonistic relationship to Kant directly shaped his own views

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
664 (#41,953)

6 months
103 (#60,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sandra Lapointe
McMaster University

References found in this work

Kant and the exact sciences.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wissenschaftslehre.Bernard Bolzano & Alois Höfler - 1837 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 22 (4):15-16.
Paradoxien des Unendlichen.Bernard Bolzano - 2012 - Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. Edited by Christian Tapp.

View all 30 references / Add more references