Dualistic Interaction, Neural Dependence, and Aquinas’s Composite View

Philosophia Christi 3 (2):459-472 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I explicate the Churchland's dualistic interaction and neural dependence objections to Cartesian dualism and argue that Aquinas’s conception of Aristotelian hylomorphism provides a way out of those objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contemporary Challenges to the Soul.Stewart Goetz & Charles Taliaferro - 2011 - In Stewart Goetz & Charles Taliaferro (eds.), A Brief History of the Soul. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 182–201.
Dualism and its importance for medicine.Irene Switankowsky - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (6):567-580.
Consciousness and the Self without Reductionism: Touching Churchland's Nerve.Eric LaRock & Mostyn W. Jones - 2024 - In Mihretu P. Guta & Scott B. Rae (eds.), Taking Persons Seriously: Where Philosophy and Bioethics Intersect. Eugene, Oregon.: Pickwick Publications, Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Not Properly a Person.Christina Van Dyke - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):186-204.
The Union and Interaction of Mind and Body.Paul Hoffman - 2007 - In Janet Broughton & John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 390--403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#338,701)

6 months
4 (#1,232,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric LaRock
Oakland University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references