Wronging by Requesting

In Mark C. Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 11 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Upon doing something generous for someone with whom you are close, some kind of reciprocity may be appropriate. But it often seems wrong to actually request reciprocity. This chapter explores the wrongness in making these requests, and why they can nevertheless appear appropriate. After considering several explanations for the wrongness at issue (involving, e.g. distinguishing oughts from obligation, the suberogatory, imperfect duties, and gift-giving norms), a novel proposal is advanced. The requests are disrespectful; they express that their agent insufficiently trusts the hearer to recognize their own reasons to reciprocate, and the close relationship between them morally requires this kind of trust. This proposal is articulated and situated in the recent discussion of the normativity of requests. The chapter concludes by explaining how these requests may appear appropriate. Agents in these relationships often have standing to make requests, though the standing is lacking in these particular cases.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Reason-Giving Force of Requests.Peter Schaber - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (2):431-442.
Requesting Belief.Benjamin McMyler - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1).
What Makes Requests Normative? The Epistemic Account Defended.Daniel Weltman - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9 (64):1715-43.
The discretionary normativity of requests.James H. P. Lewis - 2018 - Philosophers' Imprint 18:1-16.
On the notion of pre-request.Barbara Fox - 2015 - Discourse Studies 17 (1):41-63.
The Paper Chase Case and Epistemic Accounts of Request Normativity.Danny Weltman - 2022 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):199-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-22

Downloads
1,011 (#19,731)

6 months
162 (#22,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

N. G. Laskowski
University of Maryland, College Park
Kenneth Silver
Trinity College, Dublin

Citations of this work

Standing to praise.Daniel Telech - 2024 - European Journal of Philosophy 32 (4):1235-1254.
What Makes Requests Normative? The Epistemic Account Defended.Daniel Weltman - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9 (64):1715-43.
The Paper Chase Case and Epistemic Accounts of Request Normativity.Danny Weltman - 2022 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):199-205.
Bad Question!Sam Berstler - 2023 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 51 (4):413-449.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
What We Epistemically Owe To Each Other.Rima Basu - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):915–931.
Shaping the Normative Landscape.David Owens - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Epistemic partiality in friendship.Sarah Stroud - 2006 - Ethics 116 (3):498-524.

View all 23 references / Add more references