How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies

Body and Society 10 (2-3):205-229 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Science studies has often been against the normative dimension of epistemology, which made a naturalistic study of science impossible. But this is not to say that a new type of normativity cannot be detected at work inscience studies. This is especially true in the second wave of studies dealing with the body, which has aimed at criticizing the physicalization of the body without falling into the various traps of a phenomenology simply added to a physical substrate. This article explores the work of Isabelle Stengers and Vinciane Despret in that respect, and shows how it can be used to rethink the articulation between the various levels that make up a body.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-19

Downloads
86 (#243,271)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Affect.Couze Venn & Lisa Blackman - 2010 - Body and Society 16 (1):7-28.
Feminist Phenomenology and Medicine.Kristin Zeiler & Lisa Folkmarson Käll (eds.) - 2014 - State University of New York Press.
The Parliament of Things and the Anthropocene: How to Listen to ‘Quasi-Objects’.Massimiliano Simons - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):1-25.
Rorty Against Rorty.Nicholas Gaskill - 2022 - Common Knowledge 28 (3):380-401.

View all 82 citations / Add more citations