Locke’s Conflicted Cosmopolitanism: Individualism and Empire

In Benjamin Bourcier & Mikko Jakonen, British Modern International Thought in the Making: Politics and Economy from Hobbes to Bentham. Springer Verlag. pp. 71-91 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, Daniel Layman argues that there is not one Lockean conception of IR but rather (at least) two mutually incompatible conceptions: one a Ciceronian moral cosmopolitanism and the other a colonialism centered on British interests. Opposing Locke’s philosophical writings with his economic works, Layman’s reading acknowledges the contradictions and incoherence present in Locke’s IR theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Lockean Mind.Jessica Gordon-Roth & Shelley Weinberg (eds.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.
The Contexts of Locke's Political Thought.Jacqueline Rose - 2015 - In Matthew Stuart, A Companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Blackwell. pp. 45–63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-02

Downloads
308 (#93,525)

6 months
146 (#33,316)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Layman
Davidson College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty.Thomas Pogge - 1992 - Ethics 103 (1):48-75.
Dignity, Rank, and Rights.Jeremy Waldron - 2012 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
Visions of politics.Quentin Skinner - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant and stoic cosmopolitanism.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1997 - Journal of Political Philosophy 5 (1):1–25.

View all 20 references / Add more references