Are there synthetic a priori propositions? The paradigmatic case of mathematics, from Kant to Frege and Peirce

Abstract

Bernard Bolzano notoriously rejected Immanuel Kant’s claim that arithmetic and geometry were grounded on synthetic a priori judgements based on pure intuition. According to Bolzano, only analysis of concepts could ground the generality of mathematical statements and proofs; such a stand would later lead to logicism. Far from going in this way, however, Charles Sanders Peirce, who was one of the fathers of formal logic but also a great admirer of Kant, provided semiotic reasons to believe that diagrams do have a general meaning and that they can provide a knowledge which is both general and “ampliative”. Unlike mere logical analysis, diagrams help to explore concepts by going somehow “outside of them” in such a way that new knowledge is gained. This provides new support to Kant’s notion of intuitive construction, which is supposed to be both deductive and inventive.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-01

Downloads
10 (#1,466,946)

6 months
10 (#398,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruno Leclercq
University of Liège

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references