Desert, Equality and Injustice

Philosophy 50 (192):157 - 168 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Rawls's A Theory of Justice is an extremely long and elaborate work. But despite the length and the elaboration there is at the heart of the work a crucial set of unargued assumptions which need to be challenged. When this is done we are in a position to provide additional support for the critical conclusions of several other commentators who concentrate on other features of Rawls's system

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
45 (#516,855)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The logic of desert.Steven Sverdlik - 1983 - Journal of Value Inquiry 17 (4):317-324.
The methods of justice: Reflections on Rawls. [REVIEW]Marcus Singer - 1976 - Journal of Value Inquiry 10 (4):286-316.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
A theory of justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn, Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
Rawls on justice.Thomas Nagel - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (2):220-234.
The liberal theory of justice.Brian Barry - 1973 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references