Why the Incarnation Is a Superfluous Detail for Kierkegaard

Religious Studies 18 (2):171 - 175 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why does the paradox play such a crucial role in Kierkegaard's notion of truth as subjectivity? Richard Schacht explains it as follows: Eternal happiness is possible for a man only if it is possible for him to relate himself to God. A man, however, is a being who exists in time; and it would not be possible for such a being to enter into a ‘God-relationship’ if God had not also at some point existed in time. Through the ‘leap of faith’ in which one affirms the proposition that God did exist in time, one is able to enter a ‘God-relationship’ and thereby attains ‘an eternal happiness’

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God and Time.Natalja Deng - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
God and eternal boredom.Vuko Andrić & Attila Tanyi - 2017 - Religious Studies 53 (1):51-70.
Pragmatic Justification of Religious Faith.Joshua Lewis Golding - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Kierkegaard‘s Philosophical Fragments.Irfan Ajvazi - 2022 - Tesla Books 1 (Kierkegaard philosophy):10.
The Symmetry of God.Rodney Bomford - 1999 - Free Assn Books.
What Kind of Necessary Being Could God Be?Richard Swinburne - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):1--18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
73 (#288,421)

6 months
18 (#164,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael P. Levine
University of Western Australia

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references