Turn, Turn, Turn: Reply to Cotkin

Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2):333-337 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay is stimulating, but some clarification would be welcome on the relationship between religion and moral history. The reopening of moral inquiry in history probably began earlier than Cotkin suggests. On the issue of how exactly history and moral philosophy might be joined, there is much to be said for the classroom and for community programs like "Facing History and Ourselves."

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Conversation About Morals and History.George Cotkin - 2008 - Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (3):493-497.
The Complexity of Moral History: Reply to Cotkin.Neil Jumonville - 2008 - Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2):317-322.
Amoralities Not for Turning: Reply to Cotkin.Michael O'Brien - 2008 - Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2):323-326.
Reply to Cotkin.James Livingston - 2008 - Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2):327-331.
History's Moral Turn.George Cotkin - 2008 - Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2):293-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
29 (#777,287)

6 months
14 (#232,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references