Manipulation of information in medical research: Can it be morally justified?

Research Ethics 8 (1):9-23 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine whether informational manipulation, used intentionally by the researcher to increase recruitment in the research study, can be morally acceptable. We argue that this question is better answered by following a non-normative account, according to which the ethical justifiability of informational manipulation should not be relevant to its definition. The most appropriate criterion by which informational manipulation should be considered as morally acceptable or not is the researcher’s special moral duties towards their subjects. We also propose that a broader definition of manipulation of information should be adopted (than that already existing in the literature) since informational manipulation can affect not only a person’s beliefs but also their desires in decision-making. We conclude that manipulation of information can either be used to protect the potential subject and facilitate the informed consent process or be used to exploit and merely use a person for scientific goals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
40 (#550,635)

6 months
2 (#1,697,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sapfo Lignou
University College London

References found in this work

Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1986 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

View all 11 references / Add more references