The potential hierarchy of sets

Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):205-228 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some reasons to regard the cumulative hierarchy of sets as potential rather than actual are discussed. Motivated by this, a modal set theory is developed which encapsulates this potentialist conception. The resulting theory is equi-interpretable with Zermelo Fraenkel set theory but sheds new light on the set-theoretic paradoxes and the foundations of set theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
439 (#63,614)

6 months
54 (#96,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Øystein Linnebo
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Modal science.Timothy Williamson - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):453-492.
Classicism.Andrew Bacon & Cian Dorr - 2024 - In Peter Fritz & Nicholas K. Jones (eds.), Higher-Order Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-190.

View all 92 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Pluralities and Sets.Øystein Linnebo - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):144-164.
Mathematics without foundations.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):5-22.
Philosophy of mathematics, selected readings.Paul Benacerraf & Hilary Putnam - 1966 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 156:501-502.
Iteration Again.George Boolos - 1989 - Philosophical Topics 17 (2):5-21.
The Iterative Conception of Set: a (Bi-)Modal Axiomatisation.J. P. Studd - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):1-29.

View all 15 references / Add more references