The Substitutional Paradox in Russell's 1907 Letter to Hawtrey [corrected reprint]

Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 22 (2) (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note presents a transcription of Russell's letter to Hawtrey of 22 January 1907 accompanied by some proposed emendations. In that letter Russell describes the paradox that he says "pilled" the "substitutional theory" developed just before he turned to the theory of types. A close paraphrase of the derivation of the paradox in a contemporary Lemmon-style natural deduction system shows which axioms the theory must assume to govern its characteristic notion of substituting individuals and propositions for each other in other propositions. Other discussions of this paradox in the literature are mentioned. I conclude with remarks about the significance of the paradox for Russell.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions.André Fuhrmann - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):19–42.
Russell on Denoting.Paolo Mario Dau - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Russell's way out of the paradox of propositions.André Fuhrmann - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):197-213.
Russell's Happiness Paradox.Marvin Kohl - 1987 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 7 (1):86.
The Roots of Russell's Paradox.Gregory H. Moore - 1988 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 8 (1):46.
The Humble Origins of Russell's Paradox.J. Alberto Coffa - 1979 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies:31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
37 (#612,504)

6 months
5 (#1,050,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernard Linsky
University of Alberta

Citations of this work

Why Ramify?Harold T. Hodes - 2015 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (2):379-415.
The functions of Russell’s no class theory.Kevin C. Klement - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):633-664.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references