- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why Animal Suffering Matters: Philosophy, Theology, and Practical Ethics
New York: Oup Usa (2009)
Abstract
In this superbly argued and deeply engaging book, Andrew Linzey not only shows that animals can and do suffer but also that many of the justifications for inflicting animal suffering in fact provide grounds for protecting them.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why Animal Suffering Matters: Philosophy, Theology, and Practical Ethics.Susan M. Pigott - 2012 - Journal of Animal Ethics 2 (2):224-227.
Linzey, Andrew . Why Animal Suffering Matters: Philosophy, Theology, and Practical Ethics . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 . Pp. xiv+206. $29.95 (cloth). [REVIEW]Gary Chartier - 2010 - Ethics 120 (3):614-617.
Book Review: Andrew Linzey, Why Animal Suffering Matters: Philosophy, Theology, and Practical Ethics. [REVIEW]Paul Waldau - 2011 - Studies in Christian Ethics 24 (4):505-509.
Andrew Linzey: Animal theology. [REVIEW]Hans Halter - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (4):485-486.
Andrew Linzey: Animal Theology.Andrew Linzey - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (4):485-486.
Book Review: Andrew Linzey and Clair Linzey (eds), The Ethical Case against Animal Experiments. [REVIEW]David Grumett - 2020 - Studies in Christian Ethics 33 (3):421-423.
Animal ethics for veterinarians.Andrew Linzey (ed.) - 2017 - Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Andrew Linzey and C. S. Lewis’s Theology of Animals.Ben Devries - 2013 - Journal of Animal Ethics 3 (1):25-40.
Book Review : Animal Theology, by Andrew Linzey. London, SCM, 1994. x + 214pp. pb. 15. [REVIEW]Bronislaw Szerszynski - 1995 - Studies in Christian Ethics 8 (2):112-116.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#241,581)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#241,581)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why Animals Have an Interest in Freedom.Andreas T. Schmidt - 2015 - Historical Social Research 40 (4):92-109.
Rabbits, Stoats and the Predator Problem: Why a Strong Animal Rights Position Need Not Call for Human Intervention to Protect Prey from Predators.Josh Milburn - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (3):273-289.
Abolition Then and Now: Tactical Comparisons Between the Human Rights Movement and the Modern Nonhuman Animal Rights Movement in the United States. [REVIEW]Corey Lee Wrenn - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):177-200.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lv8mh dc2