The Epistemological Relevance of Conceptual Change

Grazer Philosophische Studien 99 (3):449-473 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that the customary understanding of epistemic progress as a kind of belief change is incomplete and that conceptual change has to be acknowledged as a crucial driving force in epistemic progress. The author’s argument for the epistemological relevance of conceptual change proceeds as follows. First, he develops an account of conceptual change that clearly distinguishes conceptual change from belief change. He then takes a closer look at two kinds of conceptual change that are of special interest from an epistemological point of view. He calls them “disclosing” conceptual change and “revisionary” conceptual change. He then shows that the idea of epistemic value that demarcates the realm of epistemological inquiry applies to concepts and conceptual change.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interest, epistemological belief, and intentional conceptual change.T. Andre & M. Windschitl - 2003 - In Gale M. Sinatra & Paul R. Pintrich (eds.), Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum. pp. 173--197.
Concepts and conceptual change.Paul R. Thagard - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):255-74.
Conceptual change and conceptual diversity contribute to progress in science.Paul E. Griffiths - 2015 - In Gabriele Bammer (ed.), Change!: Combining Analytic Approaches with Street Wisdom. Acton, ACT, Australia: Australian National University Press. pp. 163--176.
Notes toward an analysis of conceptual change.Mark Bevir - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (1):55 – 63.
Construction and continuity: conceptual engineering without conceptual change.Henry Jackman - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (9):909-918.
Change of belief or change of meaning?Robert W. Binkley - 1973 - In Glenn Pearce & Patrick Maynard (eds.), Conceptual change. Boston,: D. Reidel. pp. 55--76.
Conceptual change and conceptual engineering: the case of colour concepts.Lieven Decock - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2):168-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
42 (#533,951)

6 months
10 (#413,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.
Two distinctions in goodness.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):169-195.
Considered Judgment.Catherine Z. Elgin - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references