Criminal law conversations: "Desert: Empirical, not metaphysical" and "contractualism and the sharing of wrongs"

In Paul Robinson, Kimberly Ferzan & Stephen Garvey (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations. Oxford University Press, Usa (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following are two short contributions to the book, _Criminal Law Conversations_: commentaries on Paul Robinson's discussion of "Empirical Desert" and Antony Duff & Sandra Marshal's discussion of the sharing of wrongs

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Demystifying Desert.Gabriel S. Mendlow - 2020 - The Journal of Ethics 24 (3):287-294.
Guiding Commitments and Criminal Liability for Attempts.R. A. Duff - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):411-427.
Do Offenders Deserve Proportionate Punishments?Göran Duus-Otterström - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (3):463-480.
Davis, Unfair Advantage Theory, and Criminal Desert.Don E. Scheid - 1995 - Law and Philosophy 14 (3/4):375 - 409.
Culpability and Desert.Hyman Gross - 1984 - In Antony Duff & N. E. Simmonds (eds.), Philosophy and the criminal law. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
The Role of Desert in Tort Law.Amihai Wasserteill - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 18 (1):325-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-19

Downloads
34 (#661,250)

6 months
6 (#846,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew J. Lister
Bond University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references