Perhaps Medicine Is One of the Humanities?: Comment on “Shanachie and Norm” by Malcolm Parker

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (2):265-266 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why on earth should literary skills, or even a love of literature, make for a better doctor? Gribble (1992) has argued that encouraging literary critical skills sharpens those specific skills but has no benefits that flow into other cognitive areas. Nussbaum (1995), per contra, has claimed that literature does indeed allow imaginative participation in situations that are ethically challenging and therefore encourages the development of phronesis, or practical wisdom. Robin Downie (1994) taught an immensely popular course on medicine and the arts in Glasgow. Osler (1948) listed the great works that every medical student should read. And so it goes, one authority after another telling us that education in the humanities makes for better ethics, communication, empathy, humanity, understanding, and so on in medical practitioners, while in the background is a small voice saying that such things as literary skills promote only literary skills.Behind the propaganda that underpins humane medic

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-18

Downloads
40 (#566,206)

6 months
7 (#730,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Literary Education: A Revaluation.James Gribble - 1984 - British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (3):278-280.

Add more references