Current Scholarship and Future Directions in Hobbes Studies

Hobbes Studies 36 (2):213-220 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Today the study of Hobbes is both reputable and flourishing, to judge by the numbers in recent years of publications, submissions, conferences, workshops, and sessions at professional meetings devoted to Hobbes, along with growing interest from scholars in China and Latin America. I recently conducted a survey of colleagues working on Hobbes; a non-scientific survey, it included scholars working in a variety of departments. This research note reports the views of more than three dozen respondents, who answered three questions: (1) what has been at stake in Hobbes debates?; (2) have any conclusions been decisively established?; and (3) what are the open questions for the future? The answers evidence a lack of consensus but also demonstrate that we have increasingly refined and sophisticated theoretical arguments for and against contending positions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-12

Downloads
35 (#652,794)

6 months
9 (#509,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sean Lloyd
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references