The M event paradox and the specious present: An analysis and refutation of Mctaggart's 2nd argument

Analysis and Metaphysics 10:101-112 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Token-based Semantic Analysis of McTaggart's Paradox.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2011 - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 10:107-124.
Descartes' Temporal Dualism.Rebecca Lloyd Waller - 2014 - Lanham: Lexington Books.
The specious present.J. D. Mabbott - 1955 - Mind 64 (July):376-383.
Parmenides' Refutation of Change.Adrian Bardon - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 59–63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
3 (#1,852,372)

6 months
3 (#1,475,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references