Justice in Aristotle’s Household and City

Polis 20 (1-2):1-21 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Nicomachean Ethics V.6 Aristotle contrasts political justice with household justice, paternal justice, and despotic justice. My paper expands upon Aristotle’s sometimes enigmatic remarks about political justice through an examination of his account of justice within the oikia or ‘household’. Understanding political justice requires explicating the concepts of freedom and equality, but for Aristotle, the children and wife within the household are free people even if not citizens, and there exists proportionate equality between a husband and wife. Additionally, Aristotle’s articulation and defence of political justice arises out of his examination of despotic justice in the first book of the Politics. Not only are the polis and the oikia similar insofar as they are associations, but Nicomachean Ethics VIII.9–11 suggests they are even isomorphic with respect to justice and friendship. Thus, in this paper I explore the relationships between father and son, husband and wife, master and slave, and between siblings in order to see what they tell us about Aristotle’s understanding of freedom, equality, and justice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-01

Downloads
1,388 (#11,823)

6 months
299 (#7,023)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thornton Lockwood
Quinnipiac University

References found in this work

Aristotle and woman.Mary Anne Cline Horowitz - 1976 - Journal of the History of Biology 9 (2):183-213.
Aristotle and Natural Law.Tony Burns - 2011 - London: Continuum.
Aristotle and Woman.Maryanne Cline Horowitz - 1976 - Journal of the History of Biology 9 (2):183 - 213.
Aristotle and natural law.Tony Burns - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (2):142-166.

View all 8 references / Add more references