- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A STIT Logic for Reasoning About Social Influence
Studia Logica 104 (4):773-812 (2016)
Abstract
In this paper we propose a method for modeling social influence within the STIT approach to action. Our proposal consists in extending the STIT language with special operators that allow us to represent the consequences of an agent’s choices over the rational choices of another agent.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Alternative axiomatics and complexity of deliberative stit theories.Philippe Balbiani, Andreas Herzig & Nicolas Troquard - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (4):387 - 406.
Causal Agency and Responsibility: A Refinement of STIT Logic.Alexandru Baltag, Ilaria Canavotto & Sonja Smets - 2020 - In Alessandro Giordani & Jacek Malinowski (eds.), Logic in High Definition: Trends in Logical Semantics. Springer. pp. 149-176.
Combinations of Stit with Ought and Know.Ming Xu - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):851-877.
On the basic logic of STIT with a single agent.Ming Xu - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):459-483.
A dynamic logic of agency I: Stit, capabilities and powers.Andreas Herzig & Emiliano Lorini - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (1):89-121.
Complexity Results of STIT Fragments.François Schwarzentruber - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (5):1001-1045.
Inference as doxastic agency. Part II: Ramifications and refinements.Heinrich Wansing & Grigory K. Olkhovikov - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (4):408-438.
From BDI and stit to bdi-stit logic.Caroline Semmling & Heinrich Wansing - 2008 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (1-2):185-207.
Automating Agential Reasoning: Proof-Calculi and Syntactic Decidability for STIT Logics.Tim Lyon & Kees van Berkel - 2019 - In M. Baldoni, M. Dastani, B. Liao, Y. Sakurai & R. Zalila Wenkstern (eds.), PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. Springer. pp. 202-218.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-10-29
Downloads
42 (#530,464)
6 months
4 (#1,246,333)
2015-10-29
Downloads
42 (#530,464)
6 months
4 (#1,246,333)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Using argumentation schemes to find motives and intentions of a rational agent.Douglas Walton - 2020 - Argument and Computation 10 (3):233-275.
Reasoning about manipulation in multi-agent systems.Christopher Leturc & Grégory Bonnet - 2022 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 32 (2):89-155.
Choice-Driven Counterfactuals.Ilaria Canavotto & Eric Pacuit - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (2):297-345.
References found in this work
Modal Logic: Graph. Darst.Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema.
Facing the future: agents and choices in our indeterminist world.Nuel D. Belnap - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Michael Perloff & Ming Xu.
Past, present, and future.Arthur Prior - 1967 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 157:476-476.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lv8mh dc2