Early numerical representations and the natural numbers: Is there really a complete disconnect?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):660-660 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The proposal of Rips et al. is motivated by discontinuity and input claims. The discontinuity claim is that no continuity exists between early (nonverbal) numerical representations and natural number. The input claim is that particular experiences (e.g., cardinality-related talk and object-based activities) do not aid in natural number construction. We discuss reasons to doubt both claims in their strongest forms

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why cardinalities are the “natural” natural numbers.Mathieu Le Corre - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):659-659.
Math schemata and the origins of number representations.Susan Carey - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):645-646.
From numerical concepts to concepts of number.Lance J. Rips, Amber Bloomfield & Jennifer Asmuth - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):623-642.
Symbolic and nonsymbolic pathways of number processing.Tom Verguts & Wim Fias - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):539 – 554.
Weighted numbers.Mila Marinova, Marta Fedele & Bert Reynvoet - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#491,321)

6 months
15 (#202,868)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?