Interactions between mechanics and differential geometry in the 19th century

Archive for History of Exact Sciences 49 (1):1-72 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

79. This study of the interaction between mechanics and differential geometry does not pretend to be exhaustive. In particular, there is probably more to be said about the mathematical side of the history from Darboux to Ricci and Levi Civita and beyond. Statistical mechanics may also be of interest and there is definitely more to be said about Hertz (I plan to continue in this direction) and about Poincaré's geometric and topological reasonings for example about the three body problem [Poincaré 1890] (cf. also [Poincaré 1993], [Andersson 1994] and [Barrow-Green 1994]). Moreover, it would be interesting to find out how the 19th century ideas discussed here influenced the developments in the 20th century. Einstein himself is a hotly debated case. Yet, despite these shortcommings, I hope that this paper has shown that the interactions between mechanics and differential geometry is not a 20th century invention. Klein's view (see my Introduction) that Riemannian geometry grew out of mechanics, more specifically the principle of least action, cannot be maintained. On the other hand, when Riemannian geometry became known around 1870 it was immediately used in mechanics by Lipschitz. He began a continued tradition in this field, which had several elements in common with the new view of mechanics conceived by the physicists and explicitly carried out by Hertz. Before 1870 we found only scattered interactions between differential geometry and mechanics and only direct ones for systems of two or three degrees of freedom. For more degrees of freedom the geometrical ideas were in some interesting cases taken over by analogy, but these analogies did not lead to formal introduction of geometries of more than three dimensions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Gauss to Riemann Through Jacobi: Interactions Between the Epistemologies of Geometry and Mechanics?Maria de Paz & José Ferreirós - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (1):147-172.
Poincaré and the Origins of Special Relativity.John Stachel - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (2):242-256.
Quantum mechanics, radiation, and the equivalence proof.Alexander Blum & Martin Jähnert - 2024 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 78 (5):567-616.
Geometry and Structure of Quantum Phase Space.Hoshang Heydari - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (7):851-857.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-30

Downloads
16 (#1,195,422)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

From Gauss to Riemann Through Jacobi: Interactions Between the Epistemologies of Geometry and Mechanics?Maria de Paz & José Ferreirós - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (1):147-172.
Traditions in Collision: The Emergence of Logical Empiricism between the Riemannian and Helmholtzian Traditions.Giovanelli Marco - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (2):328-380.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Die mechanik in ihrer entwickelung historisch-kritisch dargestellt.Ernst Mach - 1885 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 19:232-235.
Sir William Rowan Hamilton.Thomas L. Hankins - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (2):348-349.
Ether and theory of elasticity in Beltrami's work.Rossana Tazzioli - 1993 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 46 (1):1-37.

View all 7 references / Add more references