On the regular extension axiom and its variants

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (5):511 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The regular extension axiom, REA, was first considered by Peter Aczel in the context of Constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory as an axiom that ensures the existence of many inductively defined sets. REA has several natural variants. In this note we gather together metamathematical results about these variants from the point of view of both classical and constructive set theory

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A class of higher inductive types in Zermelo‐Fraenkel set theory.Andrew W. Swan - 2022 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 68 (1):118-127.
Realizing Mahlo set theory in type theory.Michael Rathjen - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (1):89-101.
On the axiom of extensionality in the positive set theory.Olivier Esser - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (1):97-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
49 (#446,201)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Rathjen
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

A note on Bar Induction in Constructive Set Theory.Michael Rathjen - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (3):253-258.
The associated sheaf functor theorem in algebraic set theory.Nicola Gambino - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (1):68-77.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The core model.A. Dodd & R. Jensen - 1981 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 20 (1):43-75.
The strength of some Martin-Löf type theories.Edward Griffor & Michael Rathjen - 1994 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 33 (5):347-385.
On hereditarily countable sets.Thomas Jech - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (1):43-47.

Add more references