Principle Theory or Constructive Theory?

Abstract

Einstein made a distinction between principle theories like Newtonian mechanics and constructive theories like kinetic theory of gases. Are these two distinct types of theories fundamentally different from each other or can they be regarded to belong to just one type of theory? We explore this issue with respect to the theory of scientific study and come to the conclusion that there is only one type of (scientific) theory, and the constructive theory is a principle theory with only one principle, which we call the default-principle theory rather than calling it a constructive theory. One reason why constructive theories are considered as default-principle theories is that it provides a natural progression from default-principle theory to a principle theory as science progresses. This also avoids the suggestion that constructive and principle theories are considered as completely distinct entities without any interaction with each other, which may hinder scientific progress.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Einstein’s Theory of Theories and Mechanicism.Diego Maltrana, Manuel Herrera & Federico Benitez - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35 (2):153-170.
Non-deterministic inductive definitions.Benno van den Berg - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (1-2):113-135.
Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up.Francisco Flores - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 37:61-68.
Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1980 - In C. Van Fraassen Bas (ed.), The scientific image. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-02

Downloads
38 (#571,337)

6 months
4 (#1,246,655)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Luk
Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world.Philip Kitcher - 1962 - In Philip Kitcher & Wesley C. Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Univ of Minnesota Pr. pp. 410-505.
Four Decades of Scientific Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon & Anne Fagot-Largeault - 1989 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (2):355.
Minkowski space-time: A glorious non-entity.Harvey R. Brown & Oliver Pooley - 2006 - In Dennis Geert Bernardus Johan Dieks (ed.), The ontology of spacetime. Boston: Elsevier. pp. 67--89.

View all 14 references / Add more references