Symposium: The Principle of Individuation

, &
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 27 (1):69 - 120 (1953)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/aristoteliansupp/27.1.69

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Popper K. R., Kneale William, and Ayer A. J.. Symposium: What can logic do for philosophy? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XXII, London 1948, pp. 141–178. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (4):290-290.
Symposium: The Individuation of Things and Places.David Wiggins & M. J. Woods - 1963 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 37 (1):177 - 216.
Symposium: “When is a Principle a Moral Principle”?P. R. Foot & Jonathan Harrison - 1954 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 28 (1):95-134.
Symposium: When Is a Principle a Moral Principle?P. R. Foot & Jonathan Harrison - 1954 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 28 (1):95 - 134.
Willard V. Quine. On what there is. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951, Appendix, 18 pp. unnumbered. [A reprint of XV 152.] - Peter Thomas Geach. Symposium: On what there is. I. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 125–136. - A. J. Ayer. Symposium: On what there is. II. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 137–148. - W. V. Quine. Symposium: On what there is. III. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXV, London1951 pp. 149–160. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (3):222-223.
Ryle G.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 20–29.Lewy C.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 30–39.Popper K. R.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 40–60. [REVIEW]Albert A. Bennett - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):135-135.
E. J. Lemmon. Symposium: Is there only one correct system of modal logic? I.Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 23–40. - G. P. Henderson. Is there only one correct system of modal logic? II. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 41–56. [REVIEW]E. J. Lemmon & G. P. Henderson - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):306-306.
E. J. Lemmon. Symposium: Is there only one correct system of modal logic? I.Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 23–40. - G. P. Henderson. Is there only one correct system of modal logic? II. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 41–56. [REVIEW]Sörén Halldén - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):306-306.
Symposium: The Problem of Simultaneity: Is There a Paradox in the Principle of Relativity in Regard to the Relation of Time Measured to Time Lived?H. Wildon Carr, R. A. Sampson & A. N. Whitehead - 1923 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 3 (1):15 - 41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
104 (#203,486)

6 months
13 (#253,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A survey of Leśniewski's logic.V. Frederick Rickey - 1977 - Studia Logica 36 (4):407-426.
The Constraint Interpretation of Physical Emergence.James Blachowicz - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):21-40.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Science without properties.J. H. Woodger - 1951 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2 (7):193-216.
The prehistory of research into foundations.Evert W. Beth - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (9):58-81.

Add more references