Conventional and Objective Invariance: Debs and Redhead on Symmetry [Book Review]

Metascience 19 (1):15-23 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This review is a critical discussion of three main claims in Debs and Redhead’s thought-provoking book Objectivity, Invariance, and Convention. These claims are: (i) Social acts impinge upon formal aspects of scientific representation; (ii) symmetries introduce the need for conventional choice; (iii) perspectival symmetry is a necessary and sufficient condition for objectivity, while symmetry simpliciter fails to be necessary.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Objectivity, invariance, and convention: Symmetry in physical science.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (1):84-87.
The Role of Symmetry in Mathematics.Noson S. Yanofsky & Mark Zelcer - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (3):495-515.
Symmetry.Sorin Bangu - 2013 - In Robert Batterman, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford University Press USA. pp. 287-313.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-28

Downloads
760 (#35,346)

6 months
108 (#59,081)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sebastian Lutz
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Empirical adequacy: A partial structures approach.Otávio Bueno - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):585-610.
The intelligibility of the universe.Michael Redhead - 2001 - In Anthony O'Hear, Philosophy at the New Millennium. Cambridge University Press. pp. 73-90.
The Intelligibility of the Universe.Michael Redhead - 2001 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 48:73-90.
Private language.Stewart Candlish - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 references / Add more references